NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 148 A Crim R 597 61 NSWLR 378
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v Kalid KADDOUR [2004] NSWCCA 361 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 October 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Buddin J at 25; Smart AJ at 26 DECISION : Access granted
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Circumstances in which identity of juror may be disclosed - Proper interpretation of s68 of Jury Act - Whether word "person" includes a court - Whether circumstances listed in s68 are exhaustive - Disclosure permitted where necessary to establish whether or not there has been a significant miscarriage of justice LEGISLATION CITED : Jury Act 1977 Securities Industry Act 1975 Canadian Pacific Tobacco Co Ltd v Stapleton (1952) 86 CLR 1 Cowan v Stanhill Estates Pty Ltd (1966) VR 604 Hilton v Wells (1985) 157 CLR 57 CASES CITED : Kizon v Palmer (1997) 72 FCR 409 Miller v Miller (1978) 141 CLR 269 Parks Management Limited v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (1979) 1 NSWLR 274 at 277 Minarowski & Koziol v R (1995) 83 A Crim R 78 PARTIES : Regina Kalid Kaddour FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2002/2502 COUNSEL : Mr P Byrne SC (Appellant) Mr R Cogswell SC / Ms D Woodburne (Crown) SOLICITORS : Galloways Solicitors & Attorneys (Appellant) Kavanagh (Crown)
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 60334/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dunford J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 6 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2002/2502
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate