NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Fox Entertainment Precinct Pty Ltd v Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust [2004] NSWSC 214 revised - 26/03/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/02/04, 10/02/04, 11/02/04, 12/02/04, 13/02/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Claims for rectification of lease dismissed. Judgment for defendant on cross-claim for rent.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - rectification for mistake - whether parties under common mistake - whether one party took unconscionable advantage of unilateral mistake by other party - CONTRACT - "further assurance" clause in commercial contract - effect and operation of clause Budget Stationery Supplies Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (1996) 7 BPR 14,891 Australian Gypsum Ltd v Australian Plaster Co Ltd (1930) 45 CLR 54 Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Carlenka Pty Ltd (1995) 41 NSWLR 329 Fowler v Fowler (1859) 4 De G & J 250 GPI Leisure Corporation Ltd v Herdsman Investments Pty Ltd [1990] ANZ ConvR 367 Kelly v Ollis [2003] NSWSC 1032 CASES CITED : Leibler v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 2) [1999] 1 VR 1 Maralinga Pty Ltd v Major Enterprises Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 336 Pukallus v Cameron (1982) 150 CLR 447 Re Freehouse Pty Ltd (1997) 26 ACSR 662 Sande v Medsara Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 147 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 Thomas Bates & Son Ltd v Wyndham's (Lingerie) Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 505 Tutt v Doyle (1997) 42 NSWLR 10 PARTIES : Fox Entertainment Precinct Pty Limited - Plaintiff Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50163/03 COUNSEL : Mr A J Meagher SC/Ms K Richardson - Plaintiff Mr P M Wood/Mr G K J Rich - Defendant SOLICITORS : Allens Arthur Robinson - Plaintiff Clayton Utz - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate