NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jeans v Cleary [2004] NSWSC 1245 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 November 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 December 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Mathews AJ DECISION : Orders sought in the notice of motion filed on 8 April 2004 declined. The question of costs deferred. Each party to furnish written submissions on the issue of costs by 4 February 2005.
CATCHWORDS : Motion to dismiss proceedings - issue estoppel created by admission - no privity of interest - Anshun estoppel - unreasonableness - whether conflicting judgments - application dismissed. LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Blair v Curran (1962) 464 Hoystead v Commissioner of Taxation [1926] AC 155 Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co [1912] AC 716 CASES CITED : Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No2) [1996] AC 83 at 911 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589 Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare at p. 115 [67 E.R. at 319] Minero Pty Ltd v Redero Pty Ltd SC 3288 29 July 1998 PARTIES : John Anthony Jeans - Plaintiff Stephen Thomas Cleary - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20049/04 COUNSEL : J M Ireland QC - Plaintiff A Bell SC with D A McLure - Defendant SOLICITORS : Moloney Lawyers - Plaintiff J K O'Sullivan - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
MATHEWS AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate