NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Letterbox Holdings Pty Ltd v Stephen John Kirkham & Anor [2003] NSWSC 177 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2003
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J DECISION : Plaintiff's further amended summons is dismissed; Leave granted to enforce Award on costs; Judgment entered in terms of the Award; Order Plaintiff pay Defendants $80,307.68 on account of costs; Direction under s 202 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 that Defendants' bill of costs be referred to a costs assessor for assessment; Plaintiff pay Defendants' costs of these proceedings
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - COSTS - COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION Application for leave to appeal against Arbitrator's decision to award costs on a solicitor and client basis - Whether Arbitrator within jurisdiction - Whether implied repeal restricts Arbitrator's jurisdiction - Whether Arbitrator's findings inconsistent - Whether proper exercise of discretion - Whether manifest error. HELD - leave refused. Further amended summons dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Application for leave to enforce Arbitrator's award of costs. HELD - leave granted Compensation Court Act 1984 (NSW) s 18(2)(c) Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) ss 34(1), 34(1)(b), 34(1)(c), 34(5), 34(6), 38(4), 38(5), 38(5)(b)(ii), District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 148(B)(1)(c) LEGISLATION CITED : Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 69(2)(c) Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) s 202, para 45 of Sch 8, Div 6 of Pt 11, subdiv 3 of Div 6 of Pt 11, ss 208F, 208G, 208H, 208I Legal Profession Reform Act 1993 (NSW) ss 3, 4, Sch 3, 6 Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) s 34(1)(c) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 76(1)(c) New South Wales v Coya (Constructions) Pty Ltd (NSWCA, 4 August 1995, Unreported) CASES CITED : Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Promenade Investments Pty Ltd v New South Wales (1992) 26 NSWLR 203 Saraswati v R (1991) 172 CLR 1 Letterbox Holdings Pty Ltd - Plaintiff PARTIES : Stephen John Kirkham - First Defendant Lynda Christine Kirkham - Second Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 05698/02 COUNSEL : P Graham QC/R Newton - Plaintiff R McKeand - Defendants SOLICITORS : Bradfield & Scott - Plaintiff Holman Webb - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate