NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : United Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Lopmand Pty Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWSC 870 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 September 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 September 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Evidence allowed
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - witnesses - expert witness - witness not provided with Expert Witness Code of Conduct prior to embarking on task of opinion formation - expert provided with Code before report completed, and report states that it complies with Code and witness undertakes to be bound by Code - whether evidence to be rejected under Part 36, rule 13C Supreme Court Rules - whether evidence to be rejected under Section 135 Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Supreme Court Rules CASES CITED : Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Cassegrain [2002] NSWSC 980 United Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd - First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant Lopmand Pty Ltd - First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant PARTIES : Tracey John Lake - Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant Gregory Hamilton Willoughby Lindsay-Owen - Second Cross-Defendant Lindsay-Owen Holdings Pty Limited - Third Cross-Defendant Alyson Rosemary Lake - Third Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4039/99 COUNSEL : M Cashion SC; J White - Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants B DeBuse - Defendants/Cross-Claimants SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang - Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants McCooe Raves & Poole - Defendants/Cross-Claimants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EQUITY LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate