NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ida Ronen; Regina v Nitzan Ronen; Regina v Izhar Ronen [2004] NSWCCA 189 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 29 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Grove J at 1; Simpson J at 15; Howie J at 24 DECISION : STAY REFUSED
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL - CERTIFICATE BY JUDGE THAT SUITABLE FOR APPEAL - LENGTHY PRE-TRIAL HEARING - COMMENCEMENT OF HEARING IMMINENT - STAY OF TRIAL SOUGHT Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED : Judiciary Act 1903 Jury Act 1977 Regina v Ida Ronen PARTIES : Regina v Nitzan Ronen Regina v Izhar Ronen FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60177/04; 60179/04; 60178/04 R. Richter QC & N. Rosenbaum (Ida Ronen) COUNSEL : I. Hill QC & E. Power (Nitzan Ronen) P. Jones (with R. Van Der Wiel QC) (Izhar Ronen) D. Hammerschlag SC & M. McNaughton (DPP Cth) Watsons Solicitors (Ida Ronen) SOLICITORS : Charlesworth Josem Partners (Nitzan Ronen) Woodhams O'Keefe (Izhar Ronen)
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70032/03; 70222/03; 70223/03 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Whealy J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60177/04 60179/04 60178/04
GROVE J SIMPSON J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate