NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 151 A Crim R 166
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Fowler [2003] NSWCCA 321 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 July 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA; James J; Howie J DECISION : a) Appeal against conviction is dismissed; b) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted but the appeal is dismissed
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Accused convicted of murder - Appeal against conviction - Whether trial Judge erred in her directions to the jury on: lies as evidence of consciousness of guilt - circumstantial evidence - motive - accessorial liability - Whether trial Judge should have warned the jury with respect to particular evidence - Whether trial judge erred in permitting cross-examination of particular witness - Whether trial Judge erred in admitting particular evidence - Whether trial Judge erred in her directions to the jruy on the meaning of an unsworn statement - Appeal agaisnt sentencing - Whether trial judge should have imposed a lesser sentence on the basis that the accused's liberty had been affected over a length of time due to the circumstances of the case. - D Evidence Act, ss 32(2)(b)(i), 38, 55, 137, 165, 192 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Rules, r4 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, s44 R v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 R v King [2000] NSWCCA 507 R v Button and Griffin [2002] NSWCCA 159 R v Ita [2003] NSWCCA 174 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Zoneff v The Queen (2000) 200 CLR 234 Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 77 ALJR 1433 Broadhurst v The Queen (1964) AC 441 Harris v The Queen (1990) 55 SASR 321 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 R v Dellapatrona & Duffield (1993) 31 NSWLR 123 R v Adam (1999) 106 A Crim R 510 R v Merritt [(1999] NSWCCA 29 R v Murphy (1985) 4 NSWLR 42 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 520 Penny v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 1316 R v Pantoja [1995] NSWCCA 5 CASES CITED : R v Plevac [1999] NSWCCA 351 R v Fowler (No 2) [2000] NSWCCA 142 R v Phan (2001) 123 A Crim R 30 R v Adam (1999) 106 A Crim R 510 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 R v O'Leary (1946) 73 CLR 566 Stanoevski v The Queen (2001) 202 CLR 115 R v Hogan [2001] NSWCCA 292 R v Le [2002] NSWCCA 186 R v Esposito (22 August 1997) R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442 R v Flood [1999] NSWCCA 198 R v Clark (2001) 123 A Crim R 506 R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 431 R v Keyte (unreported, 16 March 1986) PARTIES : Regina Warwick Geoffrey Fowler FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60073/02 COUNSEL : A: M Ramage QC C: Mr M Grogan SOLICITORS : A: M Rumore C: S E O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate