NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Jones [2003] NSWCCA 54 revised - 12/05/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 05/02/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; Simpson J at 35; Smart AJ at 36 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - application of principle of double jeopardy to Crown appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - whether failure to properly address objective seriousness of offences - whether accumulation or concurrence of sentences considered - whether principle of totality of criminal behaviour applied - whether adequate weight given to principles of deterrence and denunciation LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act NSW 1999 s33 Regina v AEM Snr; KEM; MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Anderson [2002] NSWCCA 304 R v Baird [2002] NSWCCA 460 Bang (Seung) Ho (NSWCCA, 1 September 1992, unreported) R v Button & Griffen (2002) 54 NSWLR 455 Dinsdale v the Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1538 R v Fong [2002] NSWCCA 320 CASES CITED : R v Kalache (2000) 111 ACrim R 152 R v Kay [2002] NSWCCA 286 Mill v the Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 Pearce v The Queen (1994) 194 CLR 610 R v Sing (2002) 54 NSWLR 31 R v SMR [2002] NSWCCA 258 R v To [2002] NSWCCA 252 R v To [2002] NSWCCA 247 PARTIES : Regina (Appellant) Paul Thomas Leslie JONES (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60476/02 COUNSEL : W G Dawe, QC (Crown) R J Button (Respondent) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) Many Rivers Aboriginal Legal Service (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate