NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited (in administration) v Musico & Ors [2004] NSWSC 344 HEARING DATE(S) : 27/04/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 April 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Proper exercise of discretion is to order the stay of judgment debt on terms satisfying the Court that proceedings or alternative dispute [arbitral] resolution proceedings will be commenced by the plaintiff within a nominate period of time.
CATCHWORDS : Building and construction - Practice and procedure - Stay of judgment debt - Progress payments claimed under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 - Plaintiff obtains adjudication certificate pursuant to section 24 of Act and files adjudication certificate as a judgment for debt pursuant to section 25 of Act - Plaintiff placed under external administration-Defendants seek stay of proceedings - Evidence that defendants, if successful in final proceedings, would suffer irreparable prejudice as payment pursuant to the judgment debt could never be recouped - A failure to order the stay would in practice convert an amount which ought to be an interim payment into a final payment - Principles to be applied on application for stay of judgment debt - English authorities examined Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (UK) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Absolute Rentals Ltd v Gencor Enterprises Ltd [2000] C.I.L.L. 1637 Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd (1997) 71 ALJR 814 Alexander & Ors v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers appointed) & Anor (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Baldwins Industrial Services PLC v Barr Limited [2003] BLR 176 Brodyn Pty Ltd t/as Time Cost and Quality v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1019 Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 Herschel Engineering Ltd v Breen Property Ltd [2000] BLR 272 Jackson v Sterling Industries Limited (1987) 162 CLR 612 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd; McLean Technic Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Aust) Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 CASES CITED : Macob Civil Engineering Ltd v Morrison Construction Limited (1999) 64 Con. LR 1 Musico v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 977 Parist Holdings Pty Ltd v WT Partnership Australia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 365 Paynter Dixon Constructions Pty Ltd v JF & CG Tilston Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 869 Pegram Shopfitters Ltd v Tally Weijl (UK) Ltd [2004] BLR 65 Rainford House Ltd v Cadogan Ltd [2001] BLR 416 Reid v Howard (No 2) (1995) 184 CLR 1 RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd v DM Engineering Ltd (Northern Ireland) [2002] 1 WLR 2344 SL Timber Systems Ltd v Carillon [2001] ScotCS 167, [McFadyn LJ] TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Antoniadis [No. 2] (1999) 48 NSWLR 381 Tringali v Stewardson Stubbs & Collett (1966) 66 SR (NSW) 335 Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited (in administration) (Plaintiff) Joseph Musico (First Defendant) PARTIES : Rosemary Musico (Second Defendant) Luigi Genua (Third Defendant) Rose Genua (Fourth Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55071/03 COUNSEL : Dr D Doyle (solicitor) Plaintiff Mr M Christie, Mr S Moffatt (Defendants) SOLICITORS : The Builders Lawyers (Plaintiff) White Barnes (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate