NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 151 A CRIM R 24 62 NSWLR 58
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : ZARAVINOS v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES; STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS v ZARAVINOS [2004] NSWCA 320 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/08/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; Bryson JA at 2; Adams J at 55 DECISION : Leave granted and appeals dismissed: in detail see [54]
CATCHWORDS : FALSE ARREST - false imprisonment - Mr Zaravinos attended Police Station by appointment for interview and was arrested successively by 2 police on different but related charges, interviewed, charged, fingerprinted, photographed, bailed and released - detained about 3 hours - after several adjournments, prosecutions discontinued - power of arrest in Crimes Act 2900 s.352(2) - DC Judge found no reasonable grounds for arrest "The case has all the hallmarks of heavy-handed and officious use of arbitrary power" and awarded $25,000 damages and $5083 interest - both sides applied for leave to appeal - consideration of purpose for which power of arrest without warrant may lawfully be exercised - English authorities distinguished - lawfulness of continued detention for interview - injunction requiring destruction of fingerprint records and photographs refused - held that the damages assessed included aggravated and exemplary damages, and should not be set aside as excessive or inadequate - leave to appeal refused except as to District Court power to grant injunction and as to lawfulness of arrest - appeals dismissed. Crimes Act 1900 s.59, s.178 BA(1), subs.352(1), (2) District Court Act 1973 s.127(2)(c)(i) District Court Rules 1973 Pt.5 r.6A, s.46, s.83A LEGISLATION CITED : Interpretation Act 1987 s.9(1) Interpretation Act 1897 s.23 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Liverpool Corporation Act 1921 s.531 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Bales v. Parmeter (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 182 Chung v. Elder (1991) 31 FCR 43 Clarke v. Bailey (1933) SR (NSW) 303 Dallison v. Caffery [1965] 1 QB 348 Director of Public Prosecutions v Carr [2002] NSWSC 194 Donaldson v. Broomby (1982) 40 ALR 525 Drymalik v. Feldman [1966] SASR 227 Dumbell v. Roberts [1944] 1 All ER 326 CASES CITED : Ex parte Evers Re Leary (1945) 62 WN (NSW) 146 Fleet v. District Court of New South Wales at [2002] NSWCA 25 Frost v. State of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 226 Holgate-Mohammed v. Duke [1984] AC 437 Pelechowski v. Registrar, Court of Appeal (1999) 198 CLR 435 R v. Banner [1970] VR 240 Ruddock v. Taylor [2003] NSWCA 262 Smith v. Corrective Services Commissioner of (NSW) (1980) 147 CLR 134 State of New South Wales v. Coleman [2000] NSWCA 183 Williams v. The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 (1) CA 40091/04: George Zaravinos - Claimant State of New South Wales - 1st Opponent Mark Oswald Jenkins - 2nd Opponent PARTIES : Melinda Horan - 3rd Opponent (2) CA 41221/03: State of New South Wales - 1st Claimant Mark Oswald Jenkins - 2nd Claimant Melinda Horan - 3rd Claimant George Zaravinos - Opponent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40091/04 and 41221/03 COUNSEL : P. Menzies QC and P. Sternberg - Opponents (1)/Claimants (2) G. Ellis and A.S. Kostopoulos - Claimant (1)/Opponent (2) SOLICITORS : I V Knight, Crown Solicitor - Opponents (1) / Claimants (2) Greg Walsh & Co - Claimant (1) / Opponent (2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate