NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Robert Brian Grbin [2004] NSWCCA 220 revised - 2/07/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 39, 41; Dunford J at 1; Howie J at 40 DECISION : Appeal allowed - non-parole period varied
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Sentencing - on-going supply of amphetamines - guilty plea - utilitarian value - not related to strength of Crown case - need to specify discount allowed - special circumstances - desirability of expressing findings thereon - care and supervision of disabled child. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25 R v Bednarz [2000] NSWCCA 533 R v Brindley (1993) 66 A Crim R 204 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 CASES CITED : R v Maslen (1995) 79 A Crim R 199 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thomson and Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309, 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 PARTIES : Regina v Robert Brian Grbin FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60097/04 COUNSEL : D Arnott - Crown P Hamill - Applicant SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown Legal Aid Commission - Appllicant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/21/3097 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Maguire DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 9 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60097/04
LEVINE J DUNFORD J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate