NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) 46 ACSR 86
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Rich [2003] NSWSC 257 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 March & 1 April 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Application denied
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - subpoena - subpoena in aid of prayers for relief in interlocutory application - whether abuse of process LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180, 206C, 1317E, 1317R Aetna Pacific Securities Ltd v Hongkong Bank of Australia Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Giles J; unreported; 29 April 1993) Botany Bay Instrumentation & Control Pty Ltd v Stewart [1984] 3 NSWLR 98 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 564 CASES CITED : Palmdale Insurance Ltd (in liq) v L Grollo & Co Pty Ltd [1987] VR 113 Pasini v Vanstone [1999] FCA 1271 (15 September 1999) Re Federal Commissioner of Taxation; ex parte Swiss Aluminium Australian Ltd (1986) 68 ALR 587 Sabre Corporation v Russ Kalvin's Hair Care (1993) 46 FCR 428 Spencer Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921 Australian Securities and Investments Commission (P) John David Rich (D1/R1) PARTIES : Bradley William Keeling (D2) John Huyshe Greaves (D3) Mark Allen Silberman (D4/R2) The Partners of Minter Ellison Lawyers (A) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5934/01 COUNSEL : N Young QC with J Elliot (A) B Walker SC with D Williams (R1, R2) SOLICITORS : Minter Ellison (A) Joanne Kelly, Solicitor (R1, R2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate