NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Craftsman Homes Aust P/L & Ors v TCN Channel Nine P/L & Ors [2003] NSWSC 124 25/02/03 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/02/03 27/02/03 28/02/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2003
JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Defamation List JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J DECISION : Direct verdict against the first plaintiff in relation to both publications.
CATCHWORDS : Defamation - s7A hearing - Directed verdict - whether evidence capable of identifying first plaintiff (franchisor) - capacity to give rise to imputations. LEGISLATION CITED : Defamation Act, 1974 Craftsman Homes Aust P/L & Ors v Nine Network Aust P/L & Ors [2002] NSWSC 555 Ferrier v Jones & Anor [2003] NSWSC 39 CASES CITED : Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1239 Knupffer v London Express Newspapers Ltd [1944] AC 116 Abraham v The Advocate Co Limited [1946] 2 WWR 181 Amalgamated Television Services P/L v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 Craftsman Homes Australia Pty Limited (1st Pl) Ilvariy Pty Limited t/as Craftsman Homes Northern Rivers & PARTIES : Craftsman Homes South-West Sydney (2nd Pl) Frederick Robert Cox (3rd Pl) TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited (1st Def) Mike Munro (2nd Def) Ben Fordham (3rd Def) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20085/02 COUNSEL : J J J Garnsey QC/B E Kinsella (Pls) B R McClintock SC/M F Richardson (Defs) SOLICITORS : Walters, sols (Pls) Gilbert & Tobin (Defs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate