NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Myriam CAUVIN v PHILIP MORRIS LIMITED (ACN 004 694 428) and PHILIP MORRIS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ACN 004 316 901) & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1225 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1 DECISION : Dismiss each of the first and second defendants', third and fourth defendants' and fifth and sixth defendants' motions claiming security for costs; The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Legal Profession Act 1987 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Bray v F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (2003) 200 ALR 607 Bryan E Fencott and Associates v Eretta Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 497 Cowell v Taylor (1885) 31 Ch D 34 Haller v Worman (1861) 3 LT 741 CASES CITED : Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 32; 54 NSWLR 82 Neale v Lady Gordon Lennox [1902] 1 KB 838 Rajski v Computer Manufacturer & Design Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 122 Sykes v Sykes (1989) LR 4 CP 645 at 647 Truth About Motorways Pty Limited v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited [2000] HCA 11; 200 CLR 591 Yonge v Toynbee [1910] 1 KB 215 Plaintiff - MYRIAM CAUVIN 1st Defendant - PHILIP MORRIS LIMITED (ACN 004694428) 2nd Defendant - PHILIP MORRIS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ACN 004 316 901) PARTIES : 3rd Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALIA SERVICES LIMITED - (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WD & HO WILLS (AUST) LTD) 4th Defendant - WD & HO WILLS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 003 763 291 5th Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALASIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN, AS ROTHMANS HOLDINGS LTD) 6th Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALIA LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ROTHMANS OF PALL MALL (AUST) LTD) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11301/02 Plaintiff: N. Francey 1st & 2nd Def: Sackar QC/ S. O'Meara COUNSEL : 3rd & 4th Def: D. Beach SC / M. Wheelahan 5th & 6th Def: I. Jackman / S. Goodman
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate