NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gould v Day [2003] NSWSC 810 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : Statement of Claim dismissed. Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - whether amended statement of claim discloses a sustainable cause of action - whether SCR Pt 13 r 5 dismissal or stay, or SCR Pt 15 r 26 striking out, should be ordered - whether res judicata or issue estoppel applies - BANKRUPTCY - consideration of the right of a bankrupt to enforce proceedings to recover damages for injuries to the bankrupt's estate - whether s 116(2)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act applies LEGISLATION CITED : Bankruptcy Act 1966 Trade Practices Act 1974 Cummings v Claremont Petroleum NL (1996) 185 CLR 124, 135-6 CASES CITED : Faulkner v Bluett (1981) 52 FLR 115 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Stephen Gould (P1) Guy Blomberg (P2) PARTIES : Ken Bromfield (P3) Julian Day (D1) Alan Manly (D2) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20438/02 COUNSEL : Plaintiff - In person Defendant - In person SOLICITORS : Plaintiff - In person Defendant - In person
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 20438/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Registrar Howe JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
McDOUGALL J
28 August 2003
20438/02 STEPHEN GOULD & ORS v JULIAN DAY & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate