NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) 44 ACSR 518
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd v George Mekrizis and Ors [2003] NSWSC 126 revised - 11/03/2003 24, 26, 27 and 28 June 2002 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 July 2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 and 30 August 2002 20 September 2002 17, 22 and 25 October 2002 15, 22, 25, 26, 27 and 29 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 March 2003
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J DECISION : See par [410].
CATCHWORDS : [GUARANTEE] - Whether the Guarantee was unjust within the meaning of that term in the Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) - Substantive and procedural injustice - Whether the Guarantors are entitled to a reduction in amount guaranteed by reason of: (a) receipts from other guarantors - (b) alleged prejudicial conduct by creditor - and (c) by reason of provisions of A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) - [FRANCHISE] - Whether agreements were franchise agreements - Definition of franchise agreement under Franchising Code of Conduct - Duty of disclosure - Consideration of section 51AC of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - [MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT] - Whether the plaintiff made certain representations or whether representations should be implied - Whether representations were misleading or deceptive - Whether reliance was placed on representations to enter into Merger A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Agro Holdings Ltd v Flexi-Coil (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1658, unreported, Nicholson J, 26/11/1999 Ankar Proprietary Limited v National Westminster Finance (Australia) Limited (1987) 162 CLR 549 Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd v George Mekrizis and Ors [2002] NSWSC 982, unreported, Bergin J, 22/10/2002 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Simply No-Knead (Franchising) Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 253 Behan v Obelon Pty Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 637 Black v The Ottoman Bank (1862) 15 Moo PCC 472; 15 ER 573 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Limited v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Codelfa Construction Proprietary Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Amadio & Anor (1983) 151 CLR 447 CASES CITED : Comptroller of Stamps (Victoria) v Howard-Smith (1936) 54 CLR 614 Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Limited (1935) 53 CLR 643 Federal Wharf Company Limited v The Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1930) 44 CLR 24 Fitzwood v Unique Goal Pty Ltd (in liq) (2001) 188 ALR 566 Holder & Anor v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1932] AC 624 Hurley v McDonald's Australia Ltd (2000) ATPR 41-741 Je Maintiendrai Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (1985) 38 SASR 70 Riches v Westminster Bank Limited [1947] AC 390 Subway Systems Australia Pty Ltd v Thorpe [2000] QSC 099, unreported, Muir J, 28/4/2000 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd & Ors (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 William Brandt's Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Company, Limited [1905] AC 454 Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Donald Hartono (Sixth Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Tjipto Hartono (Seventh Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) PARTIES : Wing Nin Liu (Thirteenth Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Aircent Pty Ltd (First Cross-Claimant) Kevin McElduff (Second Cross-Defendant) James Likidis (Third Cross-Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50054/01 Mr TEF Hughes QC leading Mr CRC Newlinds on 20 September 2002 and 17 October 2002; Mr CRC Newlinds on all other dates (Plaintiff/First, Second and Third Cross-Defendants) COUNSEL : Mr P Hayes QC, Mr J Hyde and Mr A Paterson on 24 June 2002, Mr RG Forster SC on 26 and 30 August 2002, Dr C Birch SC on 9 July and 20 September 2002 and Mr A Davis on 22, 25, 26, 27 and 29 November 2002 (Seventh Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Mr P Hayes QC leading Messrs J Hyde and A Paterson (Thirteenth Defendant/First Cross-Claimants) Clayton Utz (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) SOLICITORS : John A Bush Solicitor (Sixth Defendant and Seventh Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Wright Pavuk Lawyers (Thirteenth Defendant/First Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate