NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : HIH Superannuation [2003] NSWSC 65 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 February 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : See paragraph 51
CATCHWORDS : SUPERANNUATION - private sector schemes - proposed application of actuarial surplus by augmenting of benefits - whether benefits already paid may be augmented - nature and scope of trustee's power to augment - TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - application for judicial advice - criteria against which exercise of trustee's discretion to be assessed LEGISLATION CITED : Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 Re Adelaide Unley and Mitcham Tramway Co Ltd [1907] SALR 35 Attorney-General v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83 BHLSPD Pty Ltd v Brashs Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 512 Clerical Administrative and Related Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd v Bishop (unreported, FCA, 31 July 1997) Crooks National Stores Pty Ltd v Collier (1957) 97 CLR 581 CASES CITED : Karger v Paul [1984] VR 161 Lock v Westpac Banking Corporation (1991) 25 NSWLR 593 Mettoy Pension Trustees Ltd v Evans [1990] 1 WLR 1587 Rapa v Patience (unreported, NSWSC, 14 April 1985) Wilkinson v Clerical Administrative and Related Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (1997) 7 FCR 469 Wilson v Metro Goldwyn Mayer (1980) 18 NSWLR 730 HIH Superannuation Pty Limited - Plaintiff Andrew Mackintosh - First Defendant PARTIES : Harry Ellison - Second Defendant Bob Baggett - Third Defendant Peter Duesbury - Fourth Defendant Ross Eade - Fifth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3196/02 Mr P L G Brereton SC/Mr T M Faulkner - Plaintiff (Mentions for Second and Third Defendants) COUNSEL : Mr T G R Parker - First Defendant Mr P T Newton - Fourth Defendant Mr T J Breene, Solicitor - Fifth Defendant Mallesons Stephen Jaques - Plaintiff Allens Arthur Robinson - First Defendant SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth - Second Defendant Gadens - Third Defendant Kemp Strang - Fourth Defendant Edward T Davis & Co - Fifth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate