NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Anderson v Hotel Capital Trading Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 1195 HEARING DATE(S) : 3.2.03 - 7.2.03, 10.2.03 - 14.2.03, 17.2.03 - 21.2.03, 24.2.03, 27.2.03, 11.3.03, 9.5.03, 29.5.03, 30.5.03, 7.7.03 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 December 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1 DECISION : Judgment for the defendant with costs
CATCHWORDS : Negligence - causation - foreseeability - PTSD following armed robbery at hotel - whether employer negligent in not employing security guard - whether employee use of heroin with subsequent overdose and brain damage caused by PTSD - nature of decision to take heroin LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 s38 AMP v RTA & Anor [2001] NSWCA 186; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-619 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Grey v Simpson (unreported, NSWCA 3 April 1978 per Samuels JA Hamilton v Nuroof (WA) Pty Limited (1956) 96 CLR 18 per Dixon CJ at 25 CASES CITED : March v Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506 at 517-518 Helton v Allen (1940) 63 CLR 691 at 714 Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 687 Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 at 521) Steven v Bodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 at 45 Turner v South Australia (1982) 42 ALR 669 at 670 Leif Scott Anderson (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v Hotel Capital Trading Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20438/01 COUNSEL : Mr J Conomos QC with Mr A Kostopoulos (Plaintiff) Mr W K Dodd SC with Mr M Farkas (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Carneys Lawyers (Plaintiff) Bartier Perry (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate