NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v BADANJAK [2004] NSWCCA 395 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1, 55; McClellan AJA at 53; Smart AJ at 54 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - murder - plea of guilty - appeal against severity of sentence - whether special circumstances - whether discount to sentence should have been given due to offender's illness - whether appropriate discount given for guilty plea. LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - S6(3) Sentencing Act 1989 - s 25A(1), 53 Bailey v DPP (1988) 62 ALJR 319 R v Azar [2000] NSWCCA 26 R v Burrell (2004) 114 A Crim R 207 R v Cheung NSWCCA 11 December 1995 R v Dowe NSW CCA 1 September 1995 R v F NSWCCA 21 May 1998 CASES CITED : R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Krasser NSWCCA 2 September 1993 R v L NSWCCA 17 June 1996 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Vachalec [1981] 1 NSWLR 351 R v Vento NSWCCA 6 July 1993 PARTIES : Regina Josip BADANJAK FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA CCAP 2001/2930 COUNSEL : E Wilkins (Crown) Applicant In Person SOLICITORS : S. Kavanagh (Crown) Applicant In Person
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70024/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Greg James J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate