NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Hamoui [No 1] [2004] NSWSC 1052 18/10/04 - 22/10/04 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/10/04 - 29/10/04 1/11/04 - 5/11/04 8/11/04 - 11/11/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2004
JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Criminal List JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J DECISION : The probative value of the proposed evidence significantly outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the accused. The evidence should be admitted.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Practice & Procedure - murder trial - circumstantial case - relationship evidence - reveal criminal behaviour - discretion to exclude. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Crimes Act 1900 R v Toki (2000) 116 A Crim R 536 R v Clark (2001) 123 A Crim R 506 Garner (1963) 81 WN (Pt1) (NSW) 120 Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234 Wilson v The Queen (1970) 123 CLR 334 CASES CITED : The Queen v Hissey (1973) 6 SASR 280 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 102 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Bradley (1989) 41 A Crim R 297 The Queen v Frawley (1993) 69 A Crim R 208 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Regina PARTIES : Abdul Razzak Hamoui
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70076/03 COUNSEL : T R Bailey (Crown) M Ierace SC (Accused) SOLICITORS : R Lewis (DPP sol) C Taylor (Hardin Law)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate