NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Myriam Cauvin v Philip Morris Limited (ACN 004 694 428) (Including as representative of the Companies set out in Schedule 1 of the Statement of Claim) & Ors [2003] NSWSC 631 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/3/03, 1/4/03, 2/4/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1 DECISION : Strike out those parts of the statement of claim that are set out in the Schedule that is annexed to these reasons; Dismiss the seventh defendant's motion for summary dismissal.
Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 Fair Trading Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Supreme Court Rules 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 Trade Practices Amendment Act 1977 Banque Commerciale SA en Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 Bendix Mintex v Barnes (1997) 42 NSWLR 307 Braybrook v Wright [1916] WN 74 Carnie v Esanda Finance Corporation Limited (1994-1995) 182 CLR 398 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Costa Vraca Pty Ltd v Berrigan Weed & Pest Control Pty Ltd (1997) 155 ALR 714 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 CASES CITED : General Steele Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 41 Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd v Nixon [2000] FCA 229; 170 ALR 487 State of Western Australia v Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd & Ors (1991) ATPR 41-081 Tobacco Control Coalition Incorporated v Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd & Ors [2000] FCA 1004 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2000] HCA 11; 74 ALJR 604 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2000] FCA 918 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Plaintiff - MYRIAM CAUVIN 1st Defendant - PHILIP MORRIS LIMITED (ACN 004694428) 2nd Defendant - PHILIP MORRIS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ACN 004 316 901) PARTIES : 3rd Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALIA SERVICES LIMITED - (FORMERLY KNOWN AS WD & HO WILLS (AUST) LTD) 4th Defendant - WD & HO WILLS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 003 763 291 5th Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALASIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN, AS ROTHMANS HOLDINGS LTD) 6th Defendant - BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALIA LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ROTHMANS OF PALL MALL (AUST) LTD) 7th Defendant - IMPERIAL TOBACCO AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 046 148 681) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11301/02 Plaintiff: N. Francey 1st & 2nd Def: J.Sher QC / J. Sackar QC/ S. O'Meara COUNSEL : 3rd & 4th Def: D. Beach SC / M. Wheelahan 5th & 6th Def: I. Jackman / S. Goodman 7th Def: L. Foster SC / I. Pike Plaintiff: Maurice May & Co 1st & 2nd Def: Allens Arthur Robinson SOLICITORS : 3rd & 4th Def: Corrs Chambers Westgarth 5th & 6th Def: Baker & McKenzie 7th Def: Gilbert & Tobin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate