NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v. Kanaan; R v. El-Assaad; R v. Jamal [2003] NSWCCA 396 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Hulme J at 17; Hidden J at 18 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Opinion of trial judge that facts alleged by Crown do not constitute offence - Whether an interlocutory judgment or order - Firearm fired from car in public place - Whether discharged in or near a public place. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 s.93G Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s.5F R v. Bozatsis and R v. Spanakakis (1997) 97 ACrimR 296 CASES CITED : Cheng, R v. (1999) 48 NSWLR 616 Hardman v. DPP (NSW) [2003] NSWCA 130 Lethlean v R. (1995) 83 ACrimR 197 Crown appeallant in each case PARTIES : Michael Kanaan - respondent (60442/03) Wassim El-Assad - respondent(60443/03) Saleh Jamal - respondent (60444/03 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60442/03; 60443/03; 60444/03 Mr. A. Hudson for Crown/applicant COUNSEL : Mr. C. Simpson for Kanaan Mr. F. Santisi for El-Assaad Mr. C. Simpson for Jamal Mr. S. Cavanagh for applicant SOLICITORS : Mr. K. Kyriacou for Kanaan Mr. K. Lee for El-Assaad Unknown for Mr. Jamal
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 00/11/0979 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Shadbolt DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60442/03 CCA 60443/03 CCA 60444/03 DC 00/11/0979
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate