NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Re Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2003] NSWSC 1036 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 November 2003
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Corporations List JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq DECISION : Interlocutory process dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [487]- Slip rule- Scope of rule- Construction of order not covered- Rule not to apply where the amendment is a matter of controversy. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Part 20(10)(1) Elyard Corporation Pty Ltd v DDB Needham Sydney Pty Ltd (1995) 61 FCR 385 CASES CITED : Symes v Commonwealth (1987) 89 FLR 356 R v Cripps [1984] QB 686 PARTIES : Kation Pty Limited and Peter Lawrence Lewis (Applicants) Lamru Pty Limited (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3081/97 COUNSEL : N A Cotman SC and J T Johnson (Applicants) S J Motbey (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang (Applicants) Lyons & Lyons (Respondent)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
YOUNG CJ in EQ
Wednesday 12 November 2003
3081/1997 - RE NORTEX PTY LTD (IN LIQ) JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: These proceedings have been on foot for many years and are still part heard before another judge of this Division now in their 72nd hearing day. 2 I dealt with a number of preliminary matter in these proceedings before the final hearing commenced. One such matter was a series of five separate questions which I was asked to answer and did so on 22 June 2001 with reasons. 3 The present interlocutory application filed by the applicants Kation Pty Ltd and Mr Lewis (whom I shall refer to as "Kation") is under the slip rule with respect to Question 5 answered on 22 June 2001. 4 The rule popularly called the "slip rule" is Part 20 (10)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules which reads as follows: "Where there is a clerical mistake, or an error arising from an accidental slip or omission, in a minute of a judgment or order, or in a certificate, the Court, on the application of any party or of its own motion, may, at any time, correct the mistake or error." 5 The question and answer were as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate