NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Szabo [2003] NSWCCA 341 HEARING DATE(S) : Tuesday 11 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 24; Grove J at 1; Howie J at 26 DECISION : APPEAL DISMISSED
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT BY HUSBAND ON WIFE - MULTIPLE SERIOUS MEDICAL CONDITIONS AFFLICTING OFFENDER - SPECIALLY ONEROUS CIRCUMSTANCES OF INCARCERATION - SENTENCE NEVERTHELESS MANIFESTLY INADEQUATE IN TERMS OF NON PAROLE PERIOD - DISCUSSION OF APPROACH TO AND APPLICATION OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES - DISCRETION OF APPELLATE COURT TO DISMISS CROWN APPEAL LEGISLATION CITED : Sentencing act 1989 R. v Griffith (1989) 167 CLR 372 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 263 CASES CITED : R. v. Royale [2003] NSWCCA 275 R. v Sellen (1991) 57 A Crim R 313 R. v Simpson [2001] 53 NSWLR 704 R. v Vachalec [1981] 1 NSWLR 351 PARTIES : Regina v Lajos Szabo FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60140/03 COUNSEL : E. Wilkins (Crown/Applicant) M. Buscombe (Respondent) SOLICITORS : C.K. Smith (Crown) Kings Lawyers (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/1216 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Knight DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60140/03
HODGSON JA GROVE J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate