NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ryder & Anor v Frohlich & Anor [2004] NSWSC 418 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/04/04, 20/04/04, 21/04/04, 22/04/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 May 2004 JURISDICTION: EQUITY JUDGMENT OF : Cripps AJ DECISION : Application of plaintiff for declaration a partnership continued after fundamental breach dismissed - Plaintiffs to pay defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : Partnership or joint venture - Breach of fundamental term. LEGISLATION CITED : Partnership Act 1892 s30 s35 Corporation Law s 601FA Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Ltd [1980] AC 827 Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 500 CASES CITED : Atlantic Societe d'Armement Marine SA v N V Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1967) 1 AC 361 Chitty on Contracts 28th ed pars 25-107 Jorgensen v Boyce (1896) VLR 408 FIRST PLAINTIFF Nicholas John Ryder SECOND PLAINTIFF Protected Equity Investments Pty Ltd FIRST DEFENDANT Peter Frohlich SECOND DEFENDANT PARTIES : Coastal Capital Ltd FIRST CROSS CLAIMANT Peter Frohlich SECOND CROSS CLAIMANT Coastal Capital Ltd FIRST CROSS DEFENDANT Nicholas John Ryder SECOND CROSS DEFENDANT Protected Equity Inestment Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2314/03 PLAINTIFFS Mr M Young COUNSEL : DEFENDANTS Mr R G McHugh with D W Rayment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate