NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : EMOLEUM (AUST) PTY LTD v Cecil Henry BOND & Ors [2004] NSWCA 352 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 and 16 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 139; Santow JA at 144 DECISION : Appeal upheld in part.
CATCHWORDS : Negligence - safe system of work - whether breach of duty - apportionment of liability amongst tortfeasors - psychiatric illness - quantum of damages - Calderbank offer. (D) PARTIES : EMOLEUM (AUST) PTY LTD v Cecil Henry BOND & 3 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40554/01 Appellant: L King SC/ G R Graham COUNSEL : 1st/2nd: Respondent: D E Baran 3rd Respondent: J Harris SC/ W Chipchase 4th Respondent: G R Travers Appellant: Culter Hughes & Harris SOLICITORS : 1st/2nd Respondent: Carroll & O'Dea 3rd Respondent: Sparke Helmore 4th Respondent: Moray & Agnew
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 8795/99; DC 8796/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dent DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40554/2001 DC 8795/1999 DC 8796/1999
MASON P GILES JA SANTOW JA
Wednesday 29 September 2004 EMOLEUM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD v Cecil BOND & 3 Ors
BACKGROUND Two proceedings were heard concurrently in the District Court, each being a claim for psychiatric injury stemming from the death of Martin Bond. The two plaintiffs were the deceased's father and mother.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate