NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 150 A Crim R 365 62 NSWLR 181
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Graham Edward Mailes [2004] NSWCCA 394 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Adams J at 49; Howie J at 50 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Mental Health - accused unfit to be tried - special hearing - finding that accused committed the offence - fixing limiting term - principles - no non-parole period Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Mental Health Act 1990 (NSW) Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990 Sentencing Act (now s 135 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999) R v Bedford (1986) 5 NSWLR 711 R v Boyle (unreported - 18 September 1992) R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416 CASES CITED : R v MM (2002) 135 A Crim R 216 R v Mailes (2001) 53 NSWLR 25 R v Mailes [2003] NSWSC 707 R v Mitchell (1999) 108 A Crim R 85 R H McL v The Queen [2000] 203 CLR 452 PARTIES : Regina v Graham Edward Mailes FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1939 COUNSEL : L Lamprati SC - Crown D Dalton - Applicant SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown S O'Connor - Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate