NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Crisp v. Burridge [2004] NSWCA 245 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Santow JA at 46 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Respondent to pay appellant's costs of the appeal, and to have a Suitors' Fund Certificate if otherwise eligible. 3. Orders below set aside. 4. Written submissions to be provided as to further orders to be made, by the appellant within 7 days and by the respondent within a further 7 days.
CATCHWORDS : APPEAL - Question of fact - Whether findings vitiated by errors - TORT - Negligence - Motor accident - Standard of care required of drivers. Cook v. Hawes [2002] NSWCA 79 CASES CITED : Fox v. Percy (2003) 197 ALR 201 Mifsud v. Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Pledge v. Roads & Traffic Authority (2004) 78 ALJR 572 PARTIES : Cheree-Ann Crisp - appellant Brett Michael Burridge - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41135/03 COUNSEL : Mr. P. R. Arden SC for appellant Mr. T.E.F. Hughes QC with Mr. T.D.F. Hughes for respondent SOLICITORS : Ferguson Lawyers, Sydney for appellant G.H. Healey & Co. Mascot for respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC1856/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Karpin DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41135/03 DC 1856/01
SHELLER JA HODGSON JA SANTOW JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate