NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 211 FLR 320
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina (Cth) v Ronen; Regina (Cth) v Ronen; Regina (Cth) v Ronen [2004] NSWCCA 176 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/05/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Grove J at 102; Howie J at 112 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - Whether the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) prohibits the names and occupations of potential jurors in a criminal trial from being disclosed to the accused - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Whether statute prohibiting the supply to an accused in a criminal trial of the names and occupations of potential jurors inconsistent with s 80 of the Commonwealth Constitution - Whether accused has a right to the names and occupations of jurors as part of the right of challenge - Whether any such right has existed in England and New South Wales - Variability of the right of peremptory challenge - Importance of the integrity of trial by jury. Jury Act 1912 (NSW), s 55 Jury Act 1977 (NSW), ss 28(1), 28(3), 29, 37, 38(7), 41, 42, 43, 44, 47A, 48, 52, 67A, 68 Jury Amendment Act 1997 (NSW) Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Cth), s 80 Criminal Justice Act 1988 (UK), s 118(1) Juries Act 2000 (Vic), s 39 Juries Act 1957 (WA), s 38 LEGISLATION CITED : Juries Act 1967 (ACT), s 34 Juries Act (NT), s 44 Jury Act 1995 (Qld), s 42 Juries Act 1927 (SA), s 61 Jury Act 1899 (Tas), s 54 Juries Act 1825 (UK), s 29 Juries Act 1974 (UK), s 12(1) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 86A, 86(2) Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) (No 3) Act 1988 (NSW), sched 12, cl (3) Brown v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 171 Brownlee v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 278 Cheatle v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 541 Cunliffe v The Commonwealth (1994) 182 CLR 272 Hill v Yates (1810) 12 East 229 Johns (Roger) v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 409 Katsuno v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 40 Kingswell v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 264 CASES CITED : Ng v The Queen (2003) 77 ALJR 967 R v Baum (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 401 R v Cripps (1885) 1 WN (NSW) 112 R v Cuffey (1848) 7 St Tr (NS) 467 R v Dowling (1849) 7 St Tr (NS) 381 R v Mellor (1858) 1 Dearsley & Bell 468 R v Sherratt [1991] 1 SCR 509 R v Wakefield [1918] 1 KB 216 The Case of a Juryman (1810) 12 East 231 60177/04 Ida Ronen (Appellant) Regina (Cth) (Respondent) 60178/04 PARTIES : Izhar Ronen (Appellant) Regina (Cth) (Respondent) 60179/04 Nitzan Ronen (Appellant) Regina (Cth) (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60177/04; 60178/04; 60179/04 60177/04; 60178/04; 60179/04 Appellant: (Ida Ronen) R Richter QC/N Rosenbaum COUNSEL : Appellant: (Izhar Ronen) R Van de Wiel QC/P Jones Appellant: (Nitzan Ronen) I Hill QC/E Power Crown (Cth): D Hammerschlag SC/S M McNaughton Attorney General for NSW Intervening: R Pepper 60177/04; 60178/04; 60179/04 Appellant: (Ida Ronen) Watsons Solicitors SOLICITORS : Appellant: (Izhar Ronen) Woodhams O'Keefe Appellant: (Nitzan Ronen) Charlesworth Josem Partners Crown: P Musgrave (Cth DPP)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate