NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 144 A Crim R 441
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Leung v Regina [2003] NSWCCA 51 HEARING DATE(S) : 3/5/02, 8/11/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; O'Keefe J at 2; Bell J at 105 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against severity of sentence granted; appeal against such sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Evidence - Attempt to obtain possession of narcotic goods - More than commercial quantity - Circumstantial case - Prior entry into Australia using false name and documents - False banking and other documentation - Knowledge of goods in possession of accused - Suspicious circumstances combined with failure to make inquiry - Wilful blindness - Specific direction not required - Propensity - Character - Flight - Lies - Credibility - Ambit of s 108(3) of Evidence Act 1995 - Section 108(3) not limited to the particular witness in the witness box against whom relevant allegation made - Limitation on use of prior consistent statement admitted only under s 108(3) - Procedure to be adopted in relation to evidence concerning prior consistent statement - Error - No miscarriage of justice - Role of Appellant more than mere courier, not mastermind but performing organisational role in relevant criminal enterprise Customs Act 1901: ss 233B; LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act: ss 55, 66, 97(1), 100, 102, 103, 108(3), 112, 135, 137, 190(2), 192; Part 3.8 Criminal Appeal Rules: Rule 4 BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 76 ALJR 133 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 Kural v The Queen (1987) 162 CLR 502 CASES CITED : Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Pereira v Director of Public Prosecutions (1989) 63 ALJR 1 R v A.N. [2000] NSWCCA 327 Regina v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Regina v Martin (1981) 2 NSWLR 640 Savvas v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 1 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 PARTIES : Yiu Man Leung Regina FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60471/01 COUNSEL : Mr D Patch - Appellant Mr R Maidnent SC - Crown SOLICITORS : Rutlands Law Firm - Appellant DPP (Cth) - Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate