NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Geagea v The New South Wales Ministerial Corporation [2004] NSWSC 232 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass DECISION : The plaintiff's Notice of Motion is dismissed. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Notice of Motion. I order that paragraphs 11-14 of the statement pursuant to Pt 33 r 8A filed on 21 August 2003 be struck out. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the application. The Exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Leave to amend - aggravated damages and negligence - exemplary damages - substantive punishment - adequacy of particulars - striking out of matter in a document - irrelevant material in Part 33 rule 8A statement and matters that should be specifically pleaded. LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Act 1942, s 35B, s 35C. Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 16 rules 5A and 5B, Pt 33 r 8A, r 8A (2), r 8A (2) (d) (vi), Pt 65 r 5. Gray v Motor Accident Commission [1998] HCA 70. CASES CITED : Hunter Area Health Service v Marchlewski (2000) 51 NSWLR 268. Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1. John Geagea (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v The New South Wales Ministerial Corporation (formerly the Government Insurance Office of New South Wales) (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 15305 of 1985 COUNSEL : N/A (Plaintiff) Maurice Neil QC/Mr I McGillicudy (Defendant) SOLICITORS : T D Kelly & Co (Plaintiff) J M Crestani (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate