NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 306 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 April, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 April 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Statements admitted.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - EXAMINATIONS - EVIDENCE - ADMISSIBILITY - whether s.76 and s.77 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act contain a complete code for the admissibility of transcripts of evidence given in examinations. LEGISLATION CITED : - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - s.19, s.76, s.77 - Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - s.75 Australian Securities and Investments Commission - Plaintiff Elm Financial Services Pty Ltd - First Defendant Elm Nominee Services Pty Ltd - Second Defendant Elm Management Services Pty Ltd - Third Defendant Elm Property Developments Pty Ltd - Fourth Defendant Fletcher Securities Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant PARTIES : E Star Developments Redfern Pty Ltd - Sixth Defendant E Star Developments Surry Hills Pty Ltd - Seventh Defendant Dennis Howell Terracini - Eighth Defendant Andrew Dennis Terracini - Ninth Defendant Duncan Grant McCartney - Tenth Defendant Robert John Kay - Eleventh Defendant Howard Young - Twelfth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2313/04 COUNSEL : D.R. Stack - Plaintiff M.A. Pembroke SC and A. Harding - Defendants SOLICITORS : Jan Redfern - Plaintiff Turks Legal - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate