NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2004] NSWSC 210 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 & 23 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J DECISION : Some interlocutory relief granted, balance applied for refused.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [338] - Equitable remedies - Injunctions - Interlocutory injunctions - Appropriate balancing exercise. Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 His Eminence Petar the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand v Mitreski NSWSC Master Macready 5 August 2003 unreported Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 262 CASES CITED : Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 594 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 608 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2003] NSWSC 1007 Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski [2004] NSWSC 122 His Grace Metropolitan Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (P1) The Very Reverend Father Mitko Mitrev (P2) Lambe Mitreski (D1) Pero Damceski (D2) PARTIES : Boris Minovski (D3) Eftim Eftimov (D4) Mile Marcevski (D5) Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated (D6) Naum Despotovski (D8) Attorney General for State of NSW (D9) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3369/97 T G R Parker and R E Steele (Ps) COUNSEL : G O Blake SC (D1 - 6 & D8) Excused from attendance (D9) Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Ps) SOLICITORS : McConnell Jaffray (D1 - 6 & 8) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (D9)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate