NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 341 HEARING DATE(S) : 27/9/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1, 9; Barr J at 7; Hoeben J at 8 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - receive stolen goods - plea of guilty - appeal against severity of sentence - whether sentencing judge properly considered utilitarian value of plea - whether sentence manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 21A(2)(j) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3) R v Deluca [2002] NSWCCA 446 R v Lloyd [2003] NSWCCA 49 R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 CASES CITED : R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Vranic NSWCCA 7 May 1991 R v Young [2003] NSWCCA 276 PARTIES : Regina Shane Nathan Johnson FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1882; (formerly 60233/04) COUNSEL : G Rowling (Crown) A Francis SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Crown) S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/31/0262 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Patten DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 3 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/1882
WOOD CJ at CL BARR J HOEBEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate