NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 148 A Crim R 268
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Brown & Tran [2004] NSWCCA 324 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 & 3 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sully J at 4; Sperling J at 5 DECISION : In each matter: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Verdicts set aside and convictions quashed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against conviction - where a person summoned to attend for jury service mistakenly attends court on an earlier date and is included in the jury - whether trial, verdicts and conviction a nullity - effect of non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the Jury Act 1977 - meaning and scope of the saving provisions, s73 Crimes Act 1900, s97, s112, s117, s154A, s195 LEGISLATION CITED : Juries Act 1974 (UK - England & Wales), s18 Jury Act 1977, s19, s25, s26, s27, s28, s29, s73 Dempster [1924] SASR 299 Johns (1978) 141 CLR 409 CASES CITED : Katsuno (1999) 199 CLR 40 Maher v R (1987) 163 CLR 221 Short (1898) 19 LR(NSW) 385 Tuckerman v Tuckerman & Hogg (1932) SR(NSW) 220 Regina PARTIES : Jarrod Christopher Brown Nam Duong Tran FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2003/3089 (60500/03); 2004/1884 (60235/04) Mr D Frearson for the Crown COUNSEL : Mr R Button for the Appellant Brown Mr R Sutherland SC with Mr G Walsh for the Appellant Tran Director of Public Prosecutions SOLICITORS : Shopfront Youth Legal Centre for the Appellant Brown Watsons Solicitors for the Appellant Tran
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate