NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Monroe [2003] NSWSC 168 HEARING DATE(S) : 14/3/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J DECISION : Evidence of matters referred to in supplementary statements of witness allowed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Practice and procedure - Complex criminal trial - Pre-trial disclosure ordered - Obligation to disclose evidence - Supplementary statements - Continuous obligation to disclose evidence - Relationship between ss 47 O and 47 H of Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - Meaning of "failed" - Discretion to reject evidence Justices Act 1902: ss 48 - 48 I LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Amendment (Pre Trial Disclosure) Act 2001 Criminal Procedure Act 1986: Division 2A, ss 47 H, 47 O Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ganke (1975) 1 NSWLR 252 Ex parte Twentyman; Re Powell (1959) 59 SR (NSW) 326 Holloway v Public Trustee (1959) 59 SR (NSW) 308 CASES CITED : Ingram v Ingram (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 407 Loates v Maple (1903) 88 LT 288 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Re William Neilson (1890) 18 SC (4th Series) 338 Rex v Southwalk (1921) 124 LT 623 PARTIES : Regina James Stewart Monroe FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70054/02 COUNSEL : Crown - Mr R Herps Accused - Mr R Hoenig SOLICITORS : Crown - Ms L Viney (DPP) Accused - Ms K Robinson (Legal Aid Commission of NSW)
- 8 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate