NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 47 ACSR 243
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Aron & Company v Newmont Yandal Operations [2003] NSWSC 835 HEARING DATE(S) : 08/09/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 September 2003
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Corporations List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Interlocutory injunction refused
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - voluntary administration - creditors' resolution approving deed of company arrangement - dissenting creditor seeks interlocutory injunction pending determination of claim to have resolution set aside - INJUNCTIONS - interlocutory injunction - foreign plaintiff with no presence in jurisdiction - onus to support undertaking as to damages not discharged LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.445D, 447A, 600A Re Ansett Australia Ltd (2002) 41 ACSR 598 Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brien (2000) 200 CLR 270 CASES CITED : Gibbons v LibertyOne Ltd (2002) 41 ACSR 42 Hotline Communications Ltd v Hinkley & Ors [1999] VSC 74 Lam Soon Australia Pty Ltd v Molit (No 55) Pty Ltd (1996) 70 FCR 34 J Aron & Company - Plaintiff Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) - First Defendant Mark Anthony Korda and Mark Francis Xavier Mentha - Administrators - Second Defendants Leave to appear granted to: PARTIES : Newmont Australia Limited Yandal Bond Co Limited Byrnecut Mining Pty Ltd Bowler Enterprises Pty Ltd Ian Suckling and 312 persons included in Schedule of Employees
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate