NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Kelly v Norris & 1 Ors [2004] NSWCA 260 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Bryson JA at 39 DECISION : Grant of leave to appeal refused. Ordinary summons dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Costs - matter arose out of complex and exceptionally lengthy proceedings in relation to a motor vehicle accident in which plaintiff suffered severe brain damage - application for leave to appeal - submitting appearances filed by first and second opponents - costs incurred by plaintiff's solicitors in connection with those legal proceedings reviewed by trial judge of his own motion - whether appellate court should give leave to appeal when small sum involved - orders sought to be appealed from may affect reputation of plaintiff's solicitor, the claimant in this matter - dealt with only a small part of the costs which the claimant had charged the plaintiff, his tutor and the guardian of his protected estate regarding the conduct of the litigation - those orders concerned the cost of an expert's report and its copying, costs of copying exhibit and copying costs of solicitor's letter in relation to briefing a potential witness - trial judge made the orders at his own initiative and not on the motion of any party - trial judge did not lack power to make the orders - whether circumstances justify appellate intervention - whether the undoubted discretion to charge the legal adviser with costs incurred improperly or without reasonable cause, had been properly exercised. Local Court (Civil Claims) Act 1970 s69(2A) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act s76; s101 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 52 r66 Blake v Norris (SC 12247 of 1989) Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl (Court of Appeal, 16 November 1995, unreported) BC9501771 Dunn v. Ross Lamb Motors [1978] 1 NSWLR 26 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 CASES CITED : Norris v Blake (by his Tutor Porter) (No. 2) (1997) 41 NSWLR 49 Ozpinar v. Assaily [2001] NSWCA 23 Piglowska v. Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 Re Veron (1966) 84 WN(Pt 1)(NSW) 136 Rumortex Pty Ltd v. Rodgers & Anor [2000] NSWCA 18 Wentworth v. Rogers (No. 3) (1986) 6 NSWLR 642 Timothy Denis KELLY (Claimant) PARTIES : Walter Thomas Patmore NORRIS (First Opponent) The estate of Paul Jonathan BLAKE by his tutor Brian Edward PORTER (Second Opponent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40339/03 G R GRAHAM (Claimant) COUNSEL : Ms M HOLZ (First Opponent) P KENNEDY (solicitor) (Second Opponent) T D Kelly & Co (Claimant) SOLICITORS : Ferguson Lawyers (First Opponent) Mooney & Kennedy (Second Opponent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate