NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) Aust Torts Reports 81-730
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Barwick v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 32 revised - 15/03/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/02/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Tobias JA at 123; Stein AJA at 124 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - Professional misconduct - Neglect, delay and incompetence in the administration of an estate - Misuse of trust account - Creation of contributory mortgage on title of property of the practitioner's sister as a device to obtain moneys - Money borrowed from clients of the firm of solicitors of which the practitioner was a partner - Misleading conduct towards beneficiary of the estate - Falsified documents placed on file - Misleading statements to the Law Society - Importance of trust moneys - Importance of integrity and candour in giving evidence - Use to be made of practitioner's credibility when testifying in disciplinary proceedings - Findings going outside the charge of misconduct - Importance of trust and confidence which clients place in their solicitors - Mitigating factors not sufficient to allow the practitioner to remain on the Roll - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Denial of natural justice by the Tribunal - Where the Tribunal made a finding adverse to the practitioner despite a concession made by the Law Society - Whether failure to give adequate reasons - Whether findings of Tribunal regarding credibility may be taken into account in determining the final order to be made - Findings going outside the charge of misconduct - Whether procedural unfairness means that decisions of the Tribunal and Appeal Panel should be set aside. D Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, ss 7, 89(5), 112, 113(1), 113(2)(a), 113(2)(b), 114(1) & (2), 119(1), 120(1) & (2) LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987, ss 61(1)(b), 62,167(2), Pt 10 Div 7 Legal Profession Regulation 1987, cl 27(2) Legal Profession (Trust Accounts and Controlled Money) Regulation 1988, cl 32(1), cl 33 A Solicitor v The Law Society of New South Wales [2004] 204 ALR 8 Bannister v Walton (1993) 30 NSWLR 699 Coe v New South Wales Bar Association [2000] NSWCA 13 Dupal v Law Society of New South Wales (unreported, NSWCA, 26 April 1990) In re a Practitioner (1982) 30 SASR 27 Johns v Law Society of New South Wales (1982) 2 NSWLR 1 CASES CITED : Law Society of New South Wales v Bannister (1993) 4 LPDR 24 Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 McBride v Walton (unreported, NSWCA, 15 July 1994) O'Reilly v Law Society of New South Wales (1988) 24 NSWLR 204 Pantorno v The Queen (1989) 166 CLR 466 Sinha v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 206 Smith v Bar Association of New South Wales (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 PARTIES : Ross Garfield Barwick (Appellant) Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40237/03 COUNSEL : P Brereton SC (Appellant) G C Lindsay SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Eakin McCaffery Cox (Appellant) R J Collins (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate