NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Long v Long; Estate of Ethel Edith Long [2004] NSWSC 1002 revised - 29/10/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 October 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Probate List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Order for rectification of will
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - wills - rectification - whether testatrix giving to husband "all my personal estate of whatsoever nature or kind and wheresoever situated etc" intended to include real estate as well as personal estate LEGISLATION CITED : Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898, s.29A Application of Spooner; Estate J J Davis (unreported, NSWSC, 28 July 1995) Estate of Cross (unreported, NSWSC, 9 May 1996) Hall v Hall [1891] 3 Ch 389 CASES CITED : In re Cook; Beck v Grant [1948] Ch 212 Mortensen v State of New South Wales (unreported, NSWCA, 12 December 1991) Rawack v Spicer [2002] NSWSC 849 Swinton v Bailey (1878) LR 4 App Cas 70 Trimmer v Lax; Estate M A Fresen (unreported, NSWSC, Hodgson J, 9 May 1997) Ernest William George Long - Plaintiff PARTIES : Gregory Ernest Long and Averil Ethel White - First Defendants Miranda Jane Long, Penelope Catherine Long, Tamara Margaret Onus and Dale Kenneth White - Second Defendants FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 106102/03 COUNSEL : Mr J R Wilson SC - Plaintiff Ms P R Nash - Defendant SOLICITORS : Ebsworth & Ebsworth - Plaintiff Craddock Murray Neumann - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate