NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 51 ACSR 1 149 A Crim R 378
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : ADLER v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS [2004] NSWCCA 352 revised - 04/11/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Grove J at 55; Barr J at 56 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Application for permanent stay of criminal proceedings - Corporations Act 2001 - prior civil penalty proceedings - whether abuse of process - whether double jeopardy - scope and validity of s1317P. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss1311, s1317P and 1400 Evidence Act 1995, s140(2) Adler & Anor v ASIC [2003] NSWCA 131, 46 ACSR 504 Adler v ASIC, 28 May 2004, [2004] HCATrans 182 ASIC v Adler & Ors [2002] NSWSC 171, 41 ACSR 72 ASIC v Adler [2002] NSWSC 268, 189 ALR 365 ASIC v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483, 42 ACSR 80 CASES CITED : Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd & Ors [2003] HCA 49, 77 ALJR 1629 Grills v The Queen, PJE v The Queen (1996) 70 ALJR 905 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Rich v ASIC [2004] HCA 42 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 The Queen v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635 PARTIES : Stephen Rodney ADLER v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1927 COUNSEL : Appellant: J K Sher / N Perram Crown: D Fagan SC/ M Wigney SOLICITORS : Appellant: Gilbert & Tobin Crown: Director of Public Prosecutions
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate