NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Johnston v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd; Johnston v Richardson [2003] NSWSC 454 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 April & 1 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 June 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Davies AJ DECISION : Statement of Claim struck out.
CATCHWORDS : Practice - pleading - whether statement of claim should be struck out - whether pleading disclosed reasonable cause of action - whether pleading had tendency to cause prejudice or embarrasment in the proceeding - whether particulars should be pleaded - whether abuse of process LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Pt 15 r 7 Banque Commerciale S.A. (En Liquidation) v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Carey (1976) 15 SASR 270 Expo International Pty Ltd v Chant [1979] 2 NSWLR 820 CASES CITED : Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Limited (1995) 183 CLR 563 Lawrance v Norreys (1890) 15 App Cas 210 Middleton v O'Neill (1943) 43 SR(NSW) 178 Wallingford v Mutual Society (1880) 5 App Cas 685 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 20553/00 Daryl Lindsay Johnston (Plaintiff) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (First Defendant) John Edward Star (Second Defendant) Stuart Karim Ariff (Third Defendant) PARTIES : 20040/02 Daryl Lindsay Johnston (Plaintiff) David Ross Richardson (First Defendant) Michelle Esther Harpur (Second Defendant) Ronald John White (Third Defendant) John Trevor Mitchell (Fourth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate