NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v S W Bugmy [2004] NSWCCA 258 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/06/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Bryson JA at 1; James J at 2; Kirby J at 3 DECISION : 1. Leave to appeal is granted; 2. The appeal is allowed in respect of condition (4) of the bond which is hereby quashed. The sentence imposed by Finnane DCJ on 21 February 2003 is otherwise confirmed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Practice & Procedure - appeal against sentence - whether excessive - bond - condition of bond that not enter Willicania except with Judge's permission - whether valid - test to be applied in determining validity of conditions of a bond. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 Gamgee (2001) 124 A Crim R 469 R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 CASES CITED : Allen Commercial Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1970) 123 CLR 490 Macpherson v Beath (1975) 12 SASR 174 Williams v Marsh (1985) 38 SASR 313 R v Harvey (1989) 40 A Crim R 102 R v Sanerive (CCA (Vic), unreported, 23.6.95) Lapa (No 2) (1995) 80 A Crim R 398 Miroslav Jovanovic (1999) 106 A Crim R 548 Regina PARTIES : Steven Wayne Bugmy
FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60403/03 COUNSEL : G Rowling (Crown) A Joseph (Appl) SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Crown) P Katsoolis (Appl)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate