NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Limited v Ellul & Ors [2003] NSWSC 396 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/05/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J DECISION : (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Affirm the orders made by the Senior Deputy Registrar but vary order 2 to add: Except Steven Knight and the witness known as 'Max'; (3) I direct the plaintiff to produce to the defendant all audio and visual recordings relating to the witness 'Max' and produce the supply monitored agreement; (4) Costs should be costs in cause.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal - review of decision of Senior Deputy Registrar - whether plaintiff should provide or propose evidence from witnesses LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Part 1 r 3(1), Part 36 r 2, Part 52A r 9, Part 61 r 3, 5(3); Abram National Australia Bank Ltd (2001) NSWSC 916; ASIC v Rich [2003] NSWSC 297; CASES CITED : Banque Commercial SA (in liq) v Akitial Holdings Pty Limited (1990) 169 CLR; Equityloan Limited v Windy Dropdown Pty Limited (Unreported, NSWSC, Campbell J, 12/03/03); Fiduciary Limited v Morning Star Research Pty Limited (2002) NSWSC 432; Kyabram Property Investments Pty Ltd v Murray; Murray v Duddy (2003) NSWSC 286 Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Phillip Ellul - First defendant William Cassar - Second defendant Diana Ellul - Third defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10540/01 COUNSEL : A Moses - Plaintiff L Tyndale - Defendants SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth - Plaintiff Maurice Blackburn Cashman - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate