NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 59 NSWLR 557 146 A Crim R 309
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 8; Hidden J at 81 DECISION : 1. Leave to appeal against the sentences granted; 2. Sentences below set aside; 3. In lieu thereof, order that; (a) On the first count of murder, relating to Jackson Merritt, the applicant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 24 years, to commence on 2 September 2001, and to expire on 1 September 2025, with a non parole period of 18 years, to commence from 2 September 2001 and to expire on 1 September 2019; (b) On the second count of murder relating to Taylah Pringle, the applicant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 24 years, to commence on 2 September 2006, and to expire on 1 September 2030, with a non parole period set of 18 years, to commence on 2 September 2006 and to expire on 1 September 2024; (c) On the third count of murder relating to Mikaylah Merritt, the applicant be sentenced to imprisonment for 24 years, to commence on 2 September 2011 and to expire on 1 September 2035, with a non parole period of 17 years, which is similarly to commence on 2 September 2011 and to expire on 1 September 2028.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - applicant charged with 3 counts of murder - pleas of guilty - 3 sentences of life imprisonment - whether sentences manifestly excessive - whether subjective circumstances enabled or required trial judge to impose lesser sentences - relevant principles concerning the application of s 61(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999. Crimes Act 1900 - s 19A, 431B LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Amendment (Mandatory Life Sentences) Act 1996 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 21, 21A, 22(1), 44, 61, 61(1), 61(3), Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3) House v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 499 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447 Olbrich v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Regina v Cheatham NSWSC, Grove J, 6 July 2001 Regina v Cheatham [2001] NSWSC 580 R v Cheatham [2002] NSWCCA 360 Regina v Cocking [1999] NSWCCA 311 Regina v Cikos [2001] NSWSC 35 Regina v Fraser [2004] NSWSC 53 Regina v Folbigg [2003] NSWSC 895 Regina v Garforth, Unreported, NSWCCA 23/05/94 Regina v Harris (2000) 50 NSWLR 409 Regina v Hill [2003] NSWCCA 128 Regina v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 Regina v Kalajzich (1997) 94 A Crim R 41 Regina v Kelly (1993) 30 NSWLR 64 CASES CITED : Regina v Khouzame [2000] NSWCCA 505 Regina v Miles [2002] NSWCCA 276 Regina v Monroe (2003) 56 NSWLR 652 Regina v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 Regina v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 Regina v Oliver (1980) 7 A Crim R 174 Regina v Park NSWSC Sperling J, 3 August 2000 Regina v Park [2003] NSWCCA 142 Regina v Penisini [2003] NSWSC 892 Regina v Petrinovic [1999] NSWSC 1131 Regina v Salameh NSWCCA 9 June 1994 Regina v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Regina v Twala NSWCCA 4 November 1994 Regina v Vachalec [1981] 1 NSWLR 351 Regina v Velevski NSWSC, Dunford J, 26 September 1997 Regina v Visconti [1982] 2 NSWLR 104 Skinner v The Queen (1913) 16 CLR 336 Veen (No. 2) v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 465 PARTIES : Regina Craig Andrew Merritt FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60262/03 COUNSEL : G Smith SC (Crown) T Game SC SOLICITORS : C K Smith (Crown) S E O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate