NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Tisdell [2003] NSWCCA 60 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/03/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1, 8; Dowd J at 6; Barr J at 7 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Conviction quashed; 3. Order of acquittal be entered.
CATCHWORDS : Admission that evidence given at trial was false - quashing of conviction. Regina PARTIES : v Tisdell FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60491 of 2002 COUNSEL : A: P M Paish R: P G Ingram SOLICITORS : A: Freemans R: S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 97/21/0217 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ainslie-Wallace DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60491 of 2002
MEAGHER JA DOWD J BARR J
Wednesday, 12 March 2003 REGINA v TISDELL Judgment 1 MEAGHER JA: The appellant, Mr Shane Tisdell, was arraigned on 10 September 1998 on six counts of sexual assault sexual intercourse without consent with a certain LT, his half sister. He pleaded not guilty to all six counts. 2 At the trial which followed, the jury found him guilty on five counts and not guilty on one count. Thereafter, her Honour Judge Ainsley-Moss, sentenced him to a concurrent term of imprisonment of eight years in relation to all five counts. He has now served over four years of that sentence. 3 In the trial Miss T's evidence was virtually, but not entirely, the only evidence against the appellant, in October 2002 Miss T approached the police and informed them that: a. Her evidence in the trial was false; and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate