NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Davies v Kur-ring-gai Municipal Council [2003] NSWSC 1010 HEARING DATE(S) : 17, 24, 27 October 2003 (by written submissions) JUDGMENT DATE : 4 November 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Application denied; liberty to apply
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - costs - interest on costs - whether, in the Equity Division, an order under s 95(4) should be made as of course when claimant shows payment to solicitor LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 76, 95 Supreme Court Rules, Pt 40 r 3 Australian Development Corporation Pty Ltd v White Constructions (ACT) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 280 Bennett v Jones [1977] 2 NSWLR 355 Falkner v Bourke (1990) 19 NSWLR 574 Gray v Guardian Trust Australia Ltd [2003] NSWSC 887 Grogan v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1101 CASES CITED : Home Owners Insurance Pty Ltd v Job (1983) 2 ANZ Ins Cas 60-635 Hughes Bros v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church [1999] NSWSC 1051 Hunt v RM Douglas (Roofing) Ltd [1990] 1 AC 398 Lolomanaia v Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW [2002] NSWSC 918 Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 v Carson (1994) 35 NSWLR 342 Puntoriero v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation [2002] NSWSC 217 Woods v Woods [2001] NSWSC 1108 PARTIES : Kathryn Davies (P) Kur-ring-gai Municipal Council (D) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1655/02 COUNSEL : R Horsley (P) B R McClintock SC with S Flanigan (D) SOLICITORS : Colin Biggers & Paisley (P) Deacons (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate