NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Maher v Bayview Golf Club [2004] NSWSC 275 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/03/04-26/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 June 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Prescriptive easement established exercisable night and day, of a width sufficient to allow passage of two lanes of vehicles, for purpose of use of dominant tenement as a dwelling. Benefit of easement available to subdivided portions of dominant tenement
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - easements - acquisition by prescription under doctrine of lost modern grant - easement not acquired over land of a tenant of the dominant tenement - effect of servient tenement coming under qualified title - method for ascertaining the scope of an easement acquired by prescription - effect of user not all being over precisely the same track - whether specific proof needed of use at night time to acquire an easement which permits use at night time - frequency of use needed before prescriptive easement arises - restriction of prescriptive easement by reference to purpose for which dominant tenement used during period when easement is accruing - whether prescriptive easement applies to lots into which dominant tenement is subdivided - abandonment of easements - fencing of easement - effect of illegality of use on acquisition of easement by prescription Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Prescription Act 1832 (UK) Real Property Act 1900 Transfer of Land Act 1928 (Vic) Attorney-General v Hodgson [1922] 2 Ch 429 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Westpac Banking Corporations (1988) 164 CLR 662 Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Ors [2004] UKHL 14 British Railways Board v Glass [1965] Ch 538 Butler v Muddle (1995) 6 BPR 13,984 Cannon v Villars (1878) 8 Ch D 415 Cargill v Gotts [1981] 1 WLR 441 Carr v Foster and Others (1842) 3 QB 581; 114 ER 629 Commissioner of State Revenue (Victoria) v Royal Insurance Australia Limited (1994) 182 CLR 51 Dand v Kingscote (1840) 6 M&W 174; 151 ER 370 David Securities Pty Limited and Others v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Davis and Another v Whitby [1974] 1 Ch 186 Delohery v Permanent Trustee Co of New South Wales (1904) 1 CLR 283 Dobbie and Another v Davidson and Others (1991) 23 NSWLR 625 Dunnell v Phillips (1982) 2 BPR 9517 Gallagher v Rainbow and Others (1994) 179 CLR 624 Gangemi and Another v Watson (1994) 11 WAR 505 Hamilton v Joyce [1984] 3 NSWLR 279 Hanning v Top Deck Travel Group Ltd (1993) 68 P&CR 14 Hollins v Verney (1884) 13 QBD 304 Hulley v Silversprings Bleaching and Dyeing Company Limited [1922] 2 Ch 268 Ironside, Crabb and Crabb the Cook, Cook & Barefoot (1980) 41 P&Cr 326 Jelbert v Davis and Another [1968] 1 WLR 589 Kilgour v Gaddes [1904] 1 KB 457 CASES CITED : Lock v Abercester, Limited [1939] 1 Ch 861 Milner's Safe Company, Limited v Great Northern and City Railway Company [1907] 1 Ch 208 Neaverson v Peterborough Rural District Council [1902] 1 Ch 557 Nelson v Hughes [1947] VLR 227 Oakley and Another v Boston [1976] 1 QB 270 Pavey & Matthews Proprietary Limited v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 Proprietors Strata Plan No 9,968 and Another v Proprietors Strata Plan No 11,173 and Others [1979] 2 NSWLR 605 R v Oxfordshire County Council and Another; Ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council [2000] 1 AC 335 Rochdale Canal Co v Radcliffe (1852) 18 QB 287; 118 ER 108 Rodwell and Another v G R Evans & Co Pty Ltd and Another [1978] 1 NSWLR 448 Rodwell v G R Evans & Co Pty Ltd (1977) 3 BPR 9114 RPC Holdings, Ltd v Rogers [1953] 1 All ER 1029 Short v Patrial Holdings Pty Ltd (1994) 6 BPR 13,996 Simmons v Dobson and Another [1991] 1 WLR 720 Sunset Properties Pty Ltd v Johnston (1975) 3 BPR 9185 Tehidy Minerals Ltd and Another v Norman and Others [1971] 2 QB 528 Union Lighterage Company v London Graving Dock Company [1902] 2 Ch 557 United Land Company v Great Eastern Railway Company [1875] 10 Ch App Cas 586 Walker v Espie [2003] NSWSC 559 Wheaton v Maple & Co [1893] 3 Ch 48 White and Others v Taylor and Another (No.2) [1969] 1 Ch 160 White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne Limited [1913] 1 Ch 113 Williams v James (1867) LR 2 CP 577 Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators v Dixon (1875) 1 Ch D 362 Woodhouse & Co Ltd v Kirkland (Derby) Ltd [1970] 1 WLR 1185 PARTIES : Reginald Bede Maher - Plaintiff Bayview Golf Club Limited - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4626/02 COUNSEL : N Francey - Plaintiff W Haffenden - Defendant SOLICITORS : F J Smith & Company - Plaintiff Edgington & Alfonso - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate