NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Vero Insurance Limited v Walker & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1071 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 November 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 November 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law - Administrative Law List JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The decision of Tribunal Member Ms K Thane made on 27 May 2004 is affirmed; (3) The amended summons is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of CTTT - s 67 - what is a question with respect to a matter of law LEGISLATION CITED : Commercial Tribunal Act 1984 (NSW) - s 20(5) Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Act 2001 (NSW) - s 67 Australian Gas Light Company v the Valuer-General57 WN 53 B & B Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Brian A Cheeseman & Associates Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 227 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 CASES CITED : Canham & Ors v Australian Guarantee Corporation Limited & Ors (1990) ASC 55-984 Custom Credit Corporation Limited (in Liquidation) v Commercial Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2000] ASC 155-1041; [1999] NSWSC 1021 FAI General Insurance Company Limited v Brookman & Anor [2000] NSWSC 6 Fair Trading v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 46789 [2004] NSWSC 443 Scottish Amicale Life Assurance Society v Reg Austin Insurances Pty Ltd (1985) 9 ACLR 909 Vero Insurance Limited (formerly Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Australia Limited) (Plaintiff)
Christopher Walker (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate