NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Gray v Gray [2004] NSWCA 408 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/08/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Bryson JA at 2; Young CJ in Eq at 3 DECISION : Appeal allowed only to the extent of deleting orders 1(c) and 1(d), 2(c) and 2(d) and adjusting monetary sum. Costs to be dealt with later.
CATCHWORDS : Equity- Administration of estate- Rule in Cherry v Boultbee- Effect of NZ Statute of Limitations which barred remedy only- What interest must be paid on taking of accounts. LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act, 1950 (NZ) A E Goodwin Ltd v A G Healing Ltd (1979) 7 ACLR 481 Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Douglas Morris Investments Pty Ltd [1992] 1 Qd R 478 Boddam v Ryley (1762) 1 Bro CC 239; 28 ER 1104 Byrn v Godrey (1798) 4 Ves 6; 31 ER 3 Calton v Bragg (1812) 15 East 223; 104 ER 828 Campbell v Graham (1831) 1 Russ & M 453; 39 ER 175 Campbell v Sandford (1834) 8 Bligh NS 622; 5 ER 1073 Cherry v Boultbee (1839) 4 My & Cr 442; 41 ER 171 Cityland & Property (Holdings) Ltd v Dabrah [1968] Ch 166 Courtenay v Williams (1843) 3 Hare 539; 67 ER 494 Courtenay v Williams (1846) 15 LJ Ch 204 Dingle v Coppen [1899] 1 Ch 726 Fleming v Beevers [1994] 1 NZLR 385 Heydon v Perpetual Executors, Trustee & Agency Co (WA) Ltd (1930) 45 CLR 111 Joaquin v Hall [1976] VR 788 CASES CITED : Jones v Padavatton [1969] 1 WLR 328; [1969] 2 All ER 616 Lewis v Cook (2000) 18 ACLC 490 Mendl v Smith (1943) 112 LJ Ch 279 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 Re Akerman [1891] 3 Ch 212 Re Bickerdike (No 2) [1919] VLR 62 Re Drax [1903] 1 Ch 781 Re Fox, Walker & Co; Ex parte Bishop (1880) 15 Ch D 400 Re Peruvian Railway Construction Company Ltd [1915] 2 Ch 144 Re Sewell [1909] 1 Ch 806 Re Swan's Estate (1869) 4 Ir Eq 209 Schmierer v Taouk (2004) 207 ALR 301 Seldon v Davidson [1968] 2 All ER 755 Thiess v TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd (No 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156 Upton v Ferrers (1801) 5 Ves 801; 31 ER 866 Whiteley v Hodge [2000] NSWSC 1161 Williams v Vicroft Pty Ltd (Powell J, 31.5.1989) Robert John Charles Gray (Appellant) PARTIES : Rollo Ventry Wakefield Gray (1st Respondent) Guardian Trust Australia Ltd (2nd Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40074/03 T Lynch (Appellant) COUNSEL : D P F Officer QC and P M Lane (1st Respondent) M S Willmott SC (2nd Respondent) Turner Freeman Lawyers (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Teece Hodgson & Ward (1st Respondent) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (2nd Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate